Activity

  • McDonough Walker posted an update 11 months, 1 week ago

    Webhard

    Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

    Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

    Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

    Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

    File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).

    Webhard

    It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

    Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

    Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only should be in a folder.

    You should share a URL which means you can’t share music files or videos.

    According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It’s even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It’s far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

    It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it’s often take off at that point)

    It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

    You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

    Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it’s about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you’re in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it’s in that state, you must find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

    The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, you’ll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

    Google Drive

    It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

    It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

    It is easy to connect to other Google services such as Gmail.

    Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not account for cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn’t bother me.

    There are probably the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It’s a tiny problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it’s the best in the desktop environment.

    Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

    There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There’s a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it’s not stipulated by company policy.

    If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)

    Dropbox

    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify until the start of playback.
    무료다운사이트 It is the best in the world in terms of media reading.

    There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.

    The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn’t bother with Google Drive.

    The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.

    The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It’s practically infinite unless you’re going to share large files.

    The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

    Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards…

    You will find a saying that changes in documents can’t be reflected in real time when working on documents.

    Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.

    The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

    There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

    Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

    File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the web page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

    Slow. Not paid people.

    Media access is very disadvantageous. It’s a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s easier to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

    The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

    If you don’t install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it’s better than Dropbox, but it’s significantly less than Google Drive).

    It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***

    Skydrive

    The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

    The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn’t that strong a difference.

    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.

To Top

This site is protected by wp-copyrightpro.com